Administrative Law

A Role for the Judiciary in Reforming Executive Compensation: The Implications of Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bank of America Corp.

Mathew Farrell

 
I. Introduction
Few areas of corporate governance have received as much attention as executive compensation. In the nineteenth century, robber barons were criticized and mocked, and in the early twentieth century, newspapers frequently disparaged top executives. These criticisms have continued into the twenty-first century, and they have intensified as… Read More »

Hiding in Plain Sight? Timing and Transparency in the Administrative State

Jacob Gersen & Anne Joseph O'Connell

Burying bad news is one of the oldest tricks in politics. As David Gergen, then an adviser to President Ronald Reagan, quipped in 1984, “It was one of the first lessons I learned when I arrived in Washington. If you’ve got some news that you don’t want to get noticed,… Read More »

The Institutional Dynamics of Transition Relief

Jonathan Masur & Jonathan Nash

In this Article, we consider what type of institution should provide legal transition relief and analyze the form that it should take. These questions are of great importance because the issue of legal transition relief—whether and how an institution should compensate parties because a change in the law adversely affects… Read More »

A Response to Professor Cuéllar’s “Securing” the Nation: Law, Politics, and Organization at the Federal Security Agency

David Zaring University of Pennsylvania Law School

Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar’s “Securing” the Nation: Law, Politics, and Organization at the Federal Security Agency   is both a work of history and a reminder of echoes of the past in contemporary policymaking.  It compares the great post-9/11 bureaucratic reorganization, which created the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), with one great… Read More »

Mending Holes in the Rule of (Administrative) Law

Evan J. Criddle Syracuse University Law School

The past decade has witnessed a surge of interest in Carl Schmitt’s controversial assertion that the rule of law inevitably bends under the demands of state necessity during national emergencies.  According to Schmitt, legal norms cannot constrain sovereign discretion during emergencies because “the precise details of an emergency cannot be… Read More »

From Federal Security to Homeland Security: Law, Politics, and Organization in the American Security Agenda

Marianao-Florentio Cuéllar

Americans listening to one of President Franklin Roosevelt’s fireside chats on a cabinet-sized radio in the late 1930s could not have imagined the eventual birth of the Internet technology used to disseminate this Article. They would have been hard pressed to imagine the spectacular growth of East Asian economies, or… Read More »

Off the Hook

Kevin Werbach - University of Pennsylvania

The structure of the digital economy will depend on a seemingly obscure debate about the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).  Congress established the FCC during the New Deal and vested it with authority over all interstate communication by wire or radio.  Seventy-six years later, the FCC faces critical… Read More »

After the Fall: A New Framework To Regulate “Too Big to Fail” Nonbank Financial Institutions

Alison M. Hashmall

This Editorial summarizes my forthcoming Note, 85 N.Y.U. L. REV. (forthcoming June 2010), in which I assert that our current regulatory structure is suboptimal in its regulation of the systemic risk created by the failure of large, interconnected “nonbank” financial institutions (in general, a nonbank financial institution is any institution that… Read More »

Codified Canons and the Common Law of Interpretation

Jacob Scott

Statutory construction generally involves rules of thumb that are said to allow readers to draw inferences about the meaning of a particular statute.  These “canons of construction” (also known as maxims of interpretation) guide the methods and sources used in statutory interpretation and are usually deployed according to an interpreter’s… Read More »

Learning to Live with Unequal Justice: Asylum and the Limits to Consistency

Stephen H. Legomsky - Washington University School of Law

This Article is about consistency in adjudication. I explore why consistency matters, what its determinants are, and whether it can be substantially achieved at a price that is worth paying.
This Article is also about the United States asylum adjudication system. Asylum challenges the national conscience in distinctive ways. It… Read More »