Reforming The Electoral College

Norman Williams - Willamette University

As the 2000 Presidential election reminded everyone, the President is not elected directly by the People but rather by the Electoral College.  Because each state has as many presidential electors as it has U.S. Representatives and Senators, smaller states have more electoral votes than their population warrants.  At the same… Read More »

The Bilateral Fourth Amendment and the Duties of Law-Abiding Persons

L. Rush Atkinson

I.

Ordinary people take countless measures to avoid being searched by police or other government agents.  To get an inkling of how frequently the innocent alter their behavior, consider the responses of law-abiding people to recently enacted counterterrorism programs.  When faced with delays and discomfort caused by more rigorous baggage… Read More »

Guilt by (More Than) Association: The Case for Spectator Liability in Gang Rapes

Kimberley K. Allen

In 2009, a 15-year-old student from Richmond, California left her homecoming dance to join a drinking session on school property. She quickly became intoxicated and, over the next two hours, was attacked by as many as ten assailants who “laughed and took photos as they took turns” raping her. Police… Read More »

How to Rig the Federal Courts

David Law Washington University in St. Louis

Introduction
Few scholars would dispute that the way in which political institutions are designed affects the way that policymakers behave or the kinds of policies that are produced.  Nor can it seriously be argued that courts are somehow an exception to the basic rule that institutional design matters.  It is… Read More »

The Barracuda Lacuna: Music, Political Campaigns, and the First Amendment

Sarah Schacter

On a Wednesday in September 2008, presumptive vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin was introduced at the Republican National Convention in St. Paul, Minnesota for her much-anticipated speech accepting the Republican nomination.  Before she spoke, the rock band Heart’s classic song “Barracuda” was played for the energized crowd.  The song was played again… Read More »

Showdown in the Rose Garden: Congressional Contempt, Executive Privilege, and the Role of the Courts

Tim Mastrogiacomo

In early 2007, the U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary launched an investigation into the 2006 dismissal of seven U.S. Attorneys from the Department of Justice. The Committee issued subpoenas to White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten and former White House Counsel Harriet Miers, ordering both to produce documents… Read More »

The Origins of the Privileges or Immunities Clause, Part II: John Bingham and the Second Draft of the Fourteenth Amendment

Kurt T. Lash University of Illinois College of Law

 
Kurt T. Lash
The current debates over the incorporation of the Second Amendment have reignited interest in the historical understanding of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.  The Supreme Court’s history-laden analysis of the Second Amendment in District of Columbia v. Heller signaled the Court’s openness to… Read More »

The Avena Act: An Option To Induce State Implementation of Consular Notification Rights After Medellín

Edward Duffy

On August 5, 2008, the State of Texas executed José Ernesto Medellín for his participation in the brutal rape and murder of two teenage girls, ending a fifteen-year legal battle that implicated numerous questions of constitutional and international law.  Medellín alleged that he was prejudiced in his initial trial because… Read More »

Why the Supreme Court Cares About Elites, Not the American People

Lawrence Baum & Neal Devins

 
Unlike political scientists and law professors who link Supreme Court decision making to public opinion, we argue that Supreme Court Justices care more about the views of academics, journalists, and other elites than they do about public opinion.  This is true of nearly all Justices and is especially true… Read More »

The Origins of the Privileges or Immunities Clause, Part I: “Privileges and Immunities” as an Antebellum Term of Art

Kurt T. Lash University of Illinois College of Law

Constitutional scholars generally believe that the majority of the Supreme Court in The Slaughterhouse Cases erred in their narrow construction of the Privileges or Immunities Clause. Justice Samuel Miller’s attempt to distinguish the privileges and immunities of Article IV from the privileges or immunities of Section One is particularly vilified… Read More »